Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE (all builds)
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170928
Uptime	11.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '18 at 06:40
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 73.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 250 80% 148 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 782 78% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 155 Parallax 131 120% 144 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 175 Splatting 126 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 470GB free Firmware: LHF002C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1244 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 111671640074 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 31 52 64427917343 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 346606 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (EC) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 346606 (F2) Unknown 100 100 490865 (F9) Unknown 100 100 13926 (FC) Unknown 100 100 26	10.6% Very poor	Read 52.5 Write 26.8 Mixed 29.3 8% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.59 4K Write 5.24 4K Mixed 3.01 20% 5.61 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 18.7 DQ Mixed 2.84 8% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 128%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 13,939 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 221 Write 1,461 Mixed 409 160% 697 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 9.3 41% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 386 DQ Mixed 160 137% 188 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 313%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 919GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 128 121 6591 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3520 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 40 40 43937 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1083 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 217 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 354182 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	22.8% Poor	Read 45.4 Write 33.8 Mixed 39.3 30% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.23 80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89% Excellent	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 54.2 MC Mixed 27.9 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 9.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 112%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	16x
Core i9-7980XEIntel $993Bench 80%, 4,653 samples	10x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $866Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	10x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x

SSD
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 512GBBench 178%, 586 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	14x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $878

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16