Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '18 at 12:57
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 652
67% 539 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
289GB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 148
Write 127
Mixed 81.3
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 8.22
4K Mixed 0.59
6% 3.21 MB/s
DQ Read 2.42
DQ Write 6.34
DQ Mixed 0.76
2% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 313
Write 236
Mixed 216
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 15.7
87% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 43.1
74% 148 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 108%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 129
Write 114
Mixed 129
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.24
93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3004 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68% Good
Read 126
Write 110
Mixed 115
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.48
174% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
395GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 152
Mixed 157
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 3.79
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.25
227% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 110%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
205GB free
Firmware: 4004 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 158
Mixed 140
119% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.71
4K Mixed 0.28
121% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
98GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 170
Mixed 121
121% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.23
73% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 25.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 84%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback