Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '18 at 18:50
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 134
61% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 454
42% 350 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670
Asus(1043 0467) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.47
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 7.12
7% 7.89 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.57
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 513
Write 357
Mixed 424
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 18.5
97% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 66.3
DQ Mixed 18.3
22% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
839GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 102
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.33
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.33
138% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
562GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 148
Mixed 126
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.25
93% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGN 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 13.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback