Asus F5N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus F5N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F5N
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 20:46
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60-$28
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 58.3
33% 49 Pts
4-Core 58.9
8-Core 58.7
8% 58.8 Pts
64-Core 58.1
4% 58.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 44%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 46.1
Mixed 20.5
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.24
57% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback