Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E700  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3061-A1
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '18 at 09:09
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.18 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A-00JH 240GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF30 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 473
Write 94.2
Mixed 95.4
47% 221 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 3.59
39% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 4.3
20% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 53%
Hds72505 0KLA360 500GB
276GB free
Firmware: K2AO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 51.4
Mixed 49.1
38% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E700 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback