Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '18 at 20:22
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 682
61% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1248 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 50.2
Parallax 67.5
46% 58.1 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 49
48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ VT180 240GB-$160
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 514
Write 493
Mixed 496
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 22.6
72% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 57.6
59% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 111%
LaCie P9220 2TB
946GB free, PID 106d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 79
Write 92.8
Mixed 77.9
109% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.28
68% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-083.A00LF 9905403-502.A00LF 99U5403-083.A00LF 9905403-502.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 38
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 33.8
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback