Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '16 at 07:38
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 140
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 435
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 55.1
34% 43.1 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 39
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC71704 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 460
Write 307
Mixed 359
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 29.1
94% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 65.1
71% 120 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
158GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 128
Write 113
Mixed 115
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate USB 320GB
98GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 92.1
Write 108
Mixed 62.9
112% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.32
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 64GB-$47
14GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 143
Write 34
Mixed 21.2
61% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.61
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.06
56% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback