MSI MS-1759

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE70 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-1759  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '18 at 02:20
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 49.5
36% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 219
19% 160 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
MSI(1462 1109) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 19.2
18% 19.1 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M6M 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 464
Write 413
Mixed 429
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 8.43
48% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 7.83
10% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
916GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 125
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1759 Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback