Samsung 700T1C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Samsung 700T1C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG XE700T1C-A02NL
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '16 at 22:20
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 84.4 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 104 56% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 129 17% 130 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0E1) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 120GB 621 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1594 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1116 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 42 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5763608987	88.1% Excellent	Read 512 Write 378 Mixed 408 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 35.3 109% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 94.9 107% 185 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 109%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 8GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 13.9 Mixed 16.3 20% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.24 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.13 71% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB 437 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.3 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700T1C Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700T1C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	35x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	19x
Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	54x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	29x
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	9x
LMT-128M6M 128GBLiteonitBench 71%, 622 samples	6x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 437 samples	50x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16