Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '16 at 16:25
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 149 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 485 45% 378 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1201.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Lighting 43.5 Reflection 54.3 Parallax 53.1 36% 50.3 fps	MRender 52.6 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 42 36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WL1000GSA6472 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1TB free Firmware: 60.0AB60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 172 165 6366 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 328 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 472 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 266 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 99 99 4295098371 (BE) vendor-specific 67 46 555810849 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 158 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 169 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.7% Very good	Read 145 Write 108 Mixed 112 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.14 74% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 8,875 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB2OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 211 211 51539607553 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4257 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3421 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3696 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 165 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 54463 (C2) HDA temperature 161 161 206158757922 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 30 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	43.4% Average	Read 75.2 Write 76.1 Mixed 55.1 51% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.22 62% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 45%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 34GB free Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3363 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 155423053 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 26512 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3218 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 46 623181861 (C2) HDA temperature 37 54 94489280549 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 82 60 158653434 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 179 685 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	38.6% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 71.9 Mixed 69.3 51% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.3 81% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.7% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 19.1 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 14.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	877x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	649x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	443x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	122x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359