Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '16 at 00:05
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 423
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 844E) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 47.2
28% 38.5 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 28.5
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.8% Below average
Read 257
Write 111
Mixed 133
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 6.81
68% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 6.78
13% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-430.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback