ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DAH
Memory	44.6 GB free of 48.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 16:04
Run Duration	96 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 177 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 606 58% 481 Pts	64-Core 1,380 85% 1,380 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 341.96 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 25.4 Parallax 19.7 14% 20.8 fps	MRender 25.5 Gravity 14.5 Splatting 23.8 18% 21.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M5S 256GB 2,817 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2634 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 43 (B1) Unknown 100 100 55923 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 28 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0	28.2% Poor	Read 188 Write 171 Mixed 159 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 9.54 29% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 29.4 DQ Mixed 9.99 11% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A0... 84GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.8% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 62 65% 62 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback