Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 10:21
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 145
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 433
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 82.4
55% 70.2 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 55.1
Splatting 77.7
54% 64.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 505
Write 339
Mixed 278
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 3.9
62% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 0.04
13% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
400GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 83.8
Write 69.1
Mixed 79.6
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.39
90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 58%
Wilk 4GB
0GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 3.51
Mixed 5.78
8% 7.49 MB/s
4K Read 2.35
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
10% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback