| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Megaware H55H-CM (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MEGAWARE MW-H55H-CM |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100518 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 14 '18 at 04:14 |
| Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43%
Average
|
46% 74.9 Pts
|
19% 146 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.1.1
|
31%
Below average
|
32% 41.7 fps
|
30% 35.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
26.3%
Poor
|
27% 9.3 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
32% 123 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H55H-CM Builds (Compare 28 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Megaware H55H-CM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 6x |
| Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 5x |
| Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 4x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
| R9 290XAMD $549Bench 51%, 37,353 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |