Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z87 Killer (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150428
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration	748 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 220 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 379 53% 390 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64% Good	Lighting 80.4 Reflection 81.5 Parallax 70.4 66% 77.4 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 77.2 61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10434 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 96 (B1) Unknown 97 97 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 54 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 46 (F1) Unknown 99 99 40874407937
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 520GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8549 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 94 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 10435 (0A) Spinup retry count 101 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 91 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 56 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 453 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 210454315042 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 75 75 10337 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 641 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	65.9% Good	Read 120 Write 109 Mixed 72.5 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.3 103% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 92GB free Firmware: 4.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 57 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 13559443 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15778 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 56 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 722534433 (C2) HDA temperature 33 43 73014444065 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 68 65 220213578 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	39.7% Below average	Read 60.1 Write 78.4 Mixed 69.3 52% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.26 44% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 57GB free, PID 5591, SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 165 Write 26.8 Mixed 42 73% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.74 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 40%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 5,616 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 4200, EMTEC 8 GB Color Mix USB 2.0 Flash Drive Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	4.68% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 4.47 Mixed 2.08 7% 7.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.83 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 22% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.68% Great: 9%
SEAGATE ST650211USB 5GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 5GB free, PID 0888, Seagate Pocket 5GB USB 2.0 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Read 8.28 Write 8.28 Mixed 3.65 8% 6.74 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.08 8% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 3%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 0GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 5151, Sandisk 256MB Cruzer Micro Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Read 12.8 Write 6.53 Mixed 8.59 11% 9.29 MB/s	4K Read 4.74 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.12 26% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 19.1 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	101x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	96x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	26x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16