Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 16:48
Run Duration	368 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 50.3 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 216 63% 120 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 798 71% 599 Pts	64-Core 2,031 126% 2,031 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 114 Parallax 110 86% 110 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 102 Splatting 94.3 79% 97.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 568GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 47 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 10 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 67 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 838324083	82.3% Excellent	Read 479 Write 395 Mixed 403 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 25.4 98% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 91.2 98% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 133%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20038 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 505 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 79 79 638 (AE) Unknown 100 100 38 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 56 188979478561 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 79 79 21 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 50423332011 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1671750575 (F8) Unknown 100 100 511276551	82.7% Excellent	Read 488 Write 459 Mixed 467 105% 472 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 21.6 88% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 64.5 82% 149 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 170 4191 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 581 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19817 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19985 (C2) HDA temperature 116 101 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.1% Average	Read 43.5 Write 103 Mixed 68.6 54% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.18 75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 599GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 167 4333 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 621 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 28 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 26531 (C2) HDA temperature 117 93 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.7% Good	Read 109 Write 106 Mixed 107 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.26 87% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 84%
LSI MegaSR 510GB 137GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 8GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	6.54% Terrible	Read 25.1 Write 5.52 Mixed 9.27 13% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.39 36% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.54% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-138.A00 4x16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 19.4 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.8 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16