Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 13:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 195
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 371
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 04B3) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 455
Write 318
Mixed 305
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 18.4
92% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 9.51
73% 173 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 159
Write 147
Mixed 128
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.41
113% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VS2GB1333D3 Kingston 99U5471-025.A00LF 0215 VS2GB1333D3 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback