Lenovo 20045

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20045  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bali
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '16 at 08:51
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II M320
Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 64.6
37% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 64.8
8-Core 64.8
9% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 65.2
4% 65.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Legend(17AA 3949) 256MB
Driver: atiu9pag.dll Ver. 8.712.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.39% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.65 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.39%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0010LVM1 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 53.9
Mixed 20.7
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.33
71% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMN1740HC48D8F-800 Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20045 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 20045

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback