Lenovo 42231G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 42231G4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '18 at 18:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 131
57% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 475
43% 364 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 508
Write 409
Mixed 424
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 28.7
111% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 16.9
56% 125 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 855GB
796GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 364
Mixed 207
202% 271 MB/s
4K Read 1.49
4K Write 6.26
4K Mixed 1.38
331% 3.04 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 174%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B1K70CM0- 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback