AMD Inagua CRB

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	AMD Inagua CRB (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1152 x 648 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110418
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '18 at 23:43
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Memory 39.5 1-Core 8.3 2-Core 11.9 16% 19.9 Pts	4-Core 18.9 8-Core 24.7 3% 21.8 Pts	64-Core 13 1% 13 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA A182) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.18 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MRSAJAD064GGH25C00 60GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: MRV1.4.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 86 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 16 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1572869 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 8590852100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C2) HDA temperature 75 75 107375624217 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 364876800 (EA) Unknown 100 100 988151936 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 280595691 (F2) Unknown 100 100 481683606	33.9% Below average	Read 454 Write 161 Mixed 247 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 5.65 4K Write 7.08 4K Mixed 5.25 19% 5.99 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.56% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 1.3 MC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.77 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Inagua CRB Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD Inagua CRB

CPU
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	15x
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	2x
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 25%, 47 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	17x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
SUV300S37A240G 240GBKingstonBench 73%, 5,323 samples	1x
SSD 128GBHoodiskBench 69%, 496 samples	1x

RAM
SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 1x2GBSmartBench 18%, 655 samples	3x
HB3SU004GFM8MMD33 1x4GBUnknownBench 23%, 160 samples	2x
M471B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 884 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

AMD Inagua CRB

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: AMD Inagua CRB

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)