Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '18 at 20:46
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 64.8
35% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 69.8
8-Core 72.6
10% 71.2 Pts
64-Core 70.5
4% 70.5 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
PNY(196E 1033) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 38.3
30% 36.2 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 38.3
37% 46.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
435GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 111
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.92
4K Mixed 0.55
142% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 63%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 177
Mixed 156
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.13
73% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 107%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 1TB
520GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 23
Write 23.2
Mixed 22.3
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 21%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Read 23
Write 7.81
Mixed 10
15% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.14
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EWB8GB681PAE-16IC Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G 12GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback