Lenovo 90FB0001US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90FB0001US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '18 at 04:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 398
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.64
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 8.06
6% 7.38 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.42 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB
780GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 173
Mixed 123
119% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 5.42
4K Mixed 0.67
202% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
733GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
Read 88.9
Write 90.3
Mixed 71.5
106% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.14
67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FB0001US Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FB0001US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback