MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '18 at 18:20
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 307
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 849
92% 730 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
168GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 518
Write 354
Mixed 353
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 9.8
98% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 45.8
99% 206 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 101%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 704
Write 340
Mixed 459
110% 501 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 38.8
172% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 54.7
93% 174 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
371GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 138
Mixed 174
124% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.22
92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C15-4GRR 04CD F4-2666C15-4GRR 04CD F4-2666C15-4GRR 04CD F4-2400C15-4GRR 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 1,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback