| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151225 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 09 '18 at 16:03 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.3%
Average
|
47% 85.8 Pts
|
28% 209 Pts
|
13% 212 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
|
28.4%
Poor
|
29% 31.1 fps
|
28% 34.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
65.3%
Good
|
79% 358 MB/s
|
71% 25.1 MB/s
|
71% 137 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.2%
Poor
|
21% 7.43 GB/s
|
16% 5.7 GB/s
|
23% 175 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A88XM-DS2 Builds (Compare 170 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2 - $75
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 26x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 22x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 17x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 8x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $283 |