Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '18 at 14:07
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 94.1 1-Core 109 2-Core 219 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 605 63% 504 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2966 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 214 Parallax 193 142% 194 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 194 Splatting 137 127% 157 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 4096 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9894 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1431 (B1) Unknown 94 94 192 (B3) Unknown 99 99 2 (B5) Unknown 99 99 1 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 37 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 386 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22398991969	72.5% Very good	Read 492 Write 320 Mixed 429 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 22.2 90% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 59.2 DQ Mixed 66.7 66% 109 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 80%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 29GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2327 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1702 (B1) Unknown 91 91 302 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 162 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11069689663	71.3% Very good	Read 489 Write 304 Mixed 381 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 17.9 83% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 56.7 76% 144 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 76%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 45GB free Firmware: LVD1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 183094840 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1636 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 8636338897 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2536 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1532 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 131084 (BD) vendor-specific 19 19 81 (BE) vendor-specific 66 46 572653602 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 431 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8809 (C2) HDA temperature 34 54 17179869218 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	40.8% Average	Read 65.6 Write 75.1 Mixed 79.3 56% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.65 189% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 65%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 17.4 Mixed 18.5 24% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.04 26% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.6% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.7 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 21 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	376x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	258x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	192x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	128x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	121x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	92x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	46x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16