HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 19:29
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 117
2-Core 201
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 315
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4691
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 5.56
5% 6.95 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 13.6
7% 8.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 185
Mixed 188
136% 180 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 35
Mixed 23
39% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 49%
ST ST1000DM003-1CH1 1TB
624GB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 36
Write 36.2
Mixed 21.2
39% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.26
56% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 24%
WD My Book 1130 1.5TB
396GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 32.9
Mixed 14.4
33% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.18
66% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 45%
ST500DM002-1BD14 500GB
305GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 97.5
139% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.32
48% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
202GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 35.9
Mixed 29.1
43% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.46
73% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 48%
WDC WD16 00JB-00GVA0 160GB
132GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 21.2
Mixed 22
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.37
68% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback