Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 48.5 1-Core 20 2-Core 40.1 25% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 39.8 8-Core 40.3 5% 40 Pts	64-Core 37.8 2% 37.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21F0) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.65 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 340 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1660 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 198 198 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1183 (C2) HDA temperature 67 54 197568823329	19.8% Very poor	Read 210 Write 82.4 Mixed 105 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 3.85 4K Write 8.13 4K Mixed 4.23 16% 5.4 MB/s	DQ Read 49.1 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 13 16% 28 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4D34373142353237 80CE 4D34373142353137 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16