Acer Aspire M3900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire M3900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 17:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 35
2-Core 49.3
36% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 95.6
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.16
9% 11 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 12.4
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 57.5
Mixed 53.3
41% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.28
36% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3900 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback