User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X8DT3
Memory35.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display960 x 529 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 15:42
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 101
44% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 414
36% 307 Pts
64-Core 1086
67% 1086 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 49.6
36% 41.4 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 35
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 95.8
Write 64.4
Mixed 74.1
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.51
4K Mixed 0.34
57% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 10x4GB
10 of 12 slots used
40GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback