Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory40.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 13:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 178
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 498
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 140
Parallax 120
104% 129 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 126
Splatting 106
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 101%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 116
Parallax 109
87% 111 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.4% Good
Read 268
Write 214
Mixed 219
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 21.4
108% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 79.1
85% 142 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 134%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 257
Write 178
Mixed 183
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 12.9
85% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 29.5
26% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 121%
Corsair Neutron 256GB-$255
137GB free
Firmware: M306 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.9% Good
Read 255
Write 255
Mixed 245
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 24.7
87% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 75.2
87% 149 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.3% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 28.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback