MSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A98
MotherboardMSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 00:00
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 287
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 848
83% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2793 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 185
Reflection 207
Parallax 207
151% 200 fps
Gravity 189
Splatting 135
140% 162 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT2050MX 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: R060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 496
Mixed 477
109% 489 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 34.1
106% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 33
68% 139 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 103%
WDC WDS100T1B0B- 1TB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67% Good
Read 411
Write 294
Mixed 258
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 17.6
89% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 38.4
57% 108 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
713GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 123
Mixed 133
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.007
4K Write 3.57
4K Mixed 0.04
71% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
375GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 129
Mixed 147
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 5.38
4K Mixed 0.57
178% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3700 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 32.5
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 29.3
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $936
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback