Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X10DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '18 at 21:38
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 132
51% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 510
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 5.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 59.1
Write 8.87
Mixed 15
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.15
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.06
14% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 41.2
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback