Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory244GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 244GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory240.2 GB free of 244.141 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20060824
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '18 at 11:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 161
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 634
57% 478 Pts
64-Core 1,605
99% 1,605 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AWS PVDISK 322GB
300GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 432
Write 333
Mixed 430
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 24.4
81% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 78
80% 131 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
AWS PVDISK 322GB
284GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 436
Write 331
Mixed 398
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 23.5
79% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 74.2
75% 121 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 70%
AWS PVDISK 161GB
49GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 101
Mixed 105
72% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.09
4K Write 5.29
4K Mixed 4.24
656% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 75%
AWS PVDISK 32GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 244GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4240 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 33.6
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback