Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G3 DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829E
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime11 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '18 at 17:59
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 363
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 829E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4551
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.96
Parallax 6.88
6% 7.95 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 14.5
8% 9.16 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 470
Mixed 499
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 45.9
174% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 139
144% 235 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BQXS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 DM Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback