Biostar X370GTN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar X370GTN  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '18 at 17:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 643
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 31.2
37% 35.6 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 37.2
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 517
Write 327
Mixed 390
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 25.5
102% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 47.3
58% 103 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
904GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 91.4
Mixed 94.6
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.24
77% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 4266 C19 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370GTN Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar X370GTN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback