Lenovo 80G0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 80G0 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lancer 5A6
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '18 at 21:07
Run Duration	662 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 20.2 2-Core 37.5 13% 28.9 Pts	4-Core 38.8 8-Core 37.6 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 37.8 2% 37.8 Pts
Poor: 14% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPF024HCET-000L1 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM42L1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3308 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 730 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 94 94 219 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 569 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 43 18 57 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 6 (E9) Unknown 199 199 218 (EA) Unknown 99 99 6 (EB) Unknown 99 99 317 (EC) Unknown 99 99 191 (ED) Unknown 99 99 219 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3008	34.3% Below average	Read 252 Write 81.3 Mixed 128 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 6.52 58% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 86.1 DQ Write 46 DQ Mixed 28.6 31% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Read 19.4 Write 2.99 Mixed 3.89 8% 8.77 MB/s	4K Read 2.85 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.71 76% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 13%
ZTE MMC Storage 4GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 3GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Read 4.41 Write 2.96 Mixed 3.07 4% 3.48 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.59 44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 6%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80G0 Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80G0

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	286x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	213x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	122x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	707x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	22x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	219x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	85x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 80G0

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 80G0

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)