PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP43C-DS3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 3840x2160x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20090903 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 30 '18 at 21:32 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
407GB free
Firmware: 9300
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: FH100-05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
23%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 10x |
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 4x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 6x |
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 4x |
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $161 |