Asus Z87-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-C  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJan 29 '18 at 09:09
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$100
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 344
49% 361 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 74
Parallax 64.5
62% 71.6 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 67.5
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256S2C 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 519
Write 200
Mixed 288
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 33
128% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 64.6
98% 189 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
174GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 103
Write 81.2
Mixed 86.3
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.43
108% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TX2133KLN-8GK 0420 DDR3 2133 2OZ TX2133KLN-8GK 0420 DDR3 2133 2OZ 16GB
2133, 1600, 2133, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 22.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-C Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z87-C - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback