Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H270M-DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	17.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '18 at 16:28
Run Duration	447 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 133 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 514 69% 514 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35% Below average	Lighting 45.1 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 38.3 37% 38.5 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 41.4 Splatting 36.5 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1621 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 183 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3031553922	105% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 398 Mixed 421 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 38.6 154% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 123 142% 244 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 89 214267784 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4456 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 9003529792 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16391 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2564 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 133 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 73 65 487784475 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 64 64 72897 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 68719476763 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 144 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 144 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 118412248365883 (F1) Unknown 100 253 41208767040 (F2) Unknown 100 253 31068995854
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 251GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 92GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 136 Write 29.1 Mixed 32.6 63% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.41 4K Write 0.19 4K Mixed 0.16 28% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 27%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 41GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 143 Write 84.3 Mixed 85.9 123% 105 MB/s	4K Read 4.88 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.67 70% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 37%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 5,405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	9.82% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 3.44 Mixed 5.61 9% 9.91 MB/s	4K Read 5.24 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.98 106% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.82% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GB-$25 19,648 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 12 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	79x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	65x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	59x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16