Asrock X99 OC Formula/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 OC Formula/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '18 at 12:16
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 286 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 910 87% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,138 70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gainward(10B0 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 164 Parallax 154 134% 161 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 154 Splatting 120 109% 135 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 434GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 445 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1036 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 491 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 46 231928954914 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 17091422150 (F7) Unknown 100 100 534547739 (F8) Unknown 100 100 171364070 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3595 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	77% Very good	Read 489 Write 345 Mixed 341 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 24.5 105% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 14.7 38% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 104%
Crucial_CT750MX300SSD1 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 202GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1407 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1514 (B1) Unknown 97 97 58 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 42 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 66 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10041872146	98.2% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 345 Mixed 353 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 38.3 151% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 98 114% 198 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 202GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2408 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1447 (B1) Unknown 99 99 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 287 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7294576312	96.9% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 357 Mixed 392 94% 422 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 27.3 141% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 108 129% 226 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 2,025 Write 882 Mixed 1,128 295% 1,345 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 31 167% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 29.8 98% 214 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 100GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2305 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1373 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 279 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11931378667	97.5% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 411 Mixed 424 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 28.5 150% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 46 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 120 105% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 83GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2137 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1343 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 285 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2758072388
Poor: 64% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 43.2 MC Write 52.8 MC Mixed 41.5 131% 45.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 22.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 OC Formula/3.1 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	14x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2690 v3IntelBench 72%, 1,130 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
SSD 1TBPcieBench 292%, 19,971 samples	4x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 81%, 12,182 samples	5x
BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR 4x8GBCrucialBench 109%, 193 samples	4x
Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 73%, 9,293 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $410

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16