Today's hottest deals

HP 500-152ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP 500-152ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory22 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '18 at 11:11
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 135
57% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 224
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 36
22% 29.2 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 31
Splatting 26.3
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 148
Mixed 144
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.27
88% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-152ea Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 500-152ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback