Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171229
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '18 at 16:16
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Memory 86.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 296 95% 175 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 985 97% 791 Pts	64-Core 1,233 76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2865 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Lighting 190 Reflection 207 Parallax 209 154% 202 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 193 Splatting 132 123% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 651GB free Firmware: R060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 548 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 28 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 61 167504838686 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 980257731 (F7) Unknown 100 100 30723637 (F8) Unknown 100 100 16533812 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4388 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	81.7% Excellent	Read 476 Write 338 Mixed 344 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 26.1 102% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 50.5 90% 180 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1,739 Write 1,295 Mixed 1,203 313% 1,412 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 42.6 175% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 428 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 126 151% 267 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 254%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$105 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7060 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 30 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 177 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 31 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569413160 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 176 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 567 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 169 8075 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2505 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25477 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 712 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 289 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19797 (C2) HDA temperature 115 105 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.5% Good	Read 126 Write 98.8 Mixed 93.8 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.17 78% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 237662592 (03) Spinup time 95 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6469 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 58 58 51548270346 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32810 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 881 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032835 (BD) vendor-specific 58 58 42 (BE) vendor-specific 67 49 537510608929 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 322 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 23637 (C2) HDA temperature 33 51 -140737488355295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 4505420711607 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10039234775 (F2) Unknown 100 253 21827309009	76.4% Very good	Read 132 Write 135 Mixed 115 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.21 56% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 574GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 175 5950 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4870 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 21082 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 745 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 319 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 38379 (C2) HDA temperature 114 103 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.5% Very good	Read 139 Write 134 Mixed 141 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.3 118% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 456GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 178 5850 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7582 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1004 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 343 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32707 (C2) HDA temperature 118 105 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60% Good	Read 97.1 Write 112 Mixed 103 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.23 82% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 316GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 131 126 6416 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12323 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 19 19 59306 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1413 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 458 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 175 175 77021 (C2) HDA temperature 112 100 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 21 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 19 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 21	47.3% Average	Read 95.6 Write 69.2 Mixed 75.5 60% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.19 58% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 59.8 MC Mixed 27.5 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 10.5 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16