Lenovo 37014W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 37014W1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 37014W1
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '16 at 05:20
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3667U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 138
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 209
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2207) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 4.83
3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDMCEAF180A4L 180GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LADi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 440
Write 177
Mixed 263
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 12.8
55% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 39.2
26% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback