IBM 94Y7614

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardIBM 94Y7614  (all builds)
Memory30.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '18 at 08:50
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 119
46% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 325
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 34D5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.33 fps
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 0.43
1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 72GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 98.5
Write 75.3
Mixed 83.5
65% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.84
154% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 210%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
6GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 8.1
Mixed 9.27
15% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.39
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
21% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback