IBM THURLEY_

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemIBM THURLEY_  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 49Y6498
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090626
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 25 '18 at 02:29
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5540
Node 1 Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 60
2-Core 123
55% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 326
37% 288 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 146GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1.40
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 156
Write 82.7
Mixed 109
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.58
121% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 146%
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 146GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 77
Mixed 92.3
69% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.55
112% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback