Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 16:36
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 93
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 458
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3165
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 5.41
4% 5.29 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.17
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 515
Write 196
Mixed 239
69% 317 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 15
118% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 56
72% 128 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
748GB free
Firmware: 3J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 98.1
Mixed 94.9
73% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.19
60% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 99U5428-068.A00LF ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 99U5428-068.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback