Lenovo 20EQS56Y00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20EQS56Y00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS56Y00
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161110
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 13:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 203
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 596
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19
18% 19.1 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.5
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4483
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 6.41
6% 9.88 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.03
Splatting 13.1
8% 9.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZSLW1T0HMLH-000L1 1TB
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L0QCXY7
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,686
Write 472
Mixed 700
207% 953 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 22.4
131% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 128
84% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 138%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 21.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback