| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171031 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '18 at 01:06 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.4%
Very good
|
80% 145 Pts
|
68% 553 Pts
|
44% 710 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.9%
Poor
|
6% 61.8 fps
|
70% 85 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
97%
Outstanding
|
98% 442 MB/s
|
136% 49.6 MB/s
|
84% 185 MB/s
|
|
|
95.3%
Outstanding
|
120% 160 MB/s
|
85% 0.74 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2800 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
|
38.9%
Below average
|
39% 13.5 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
44% 90.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,023 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,424x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 671x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 271x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 364x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 314x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 227x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $696 |