Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111019
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '18 at 21:52
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 548
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 160
Parallax 160
126% 158 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 147
Splatting 103
95% 117 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 406
Write 229
Mixed 299
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 15.8
88% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 76.9
89% 152 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5A31364758334D3441313630304339 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 28.6
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback