Fujitsu ESPRIMO P2550

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P2550 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2950-A1
Memory	2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091002
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '16 at 18:19
Run Duration	791 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 83.5 46% 69.3 Pts	4-Core 82.6 8-Core 84 11% 83.3 Pts	64-Core 83.6 5% 83.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1287) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 10.1 8% 9.58 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.07 Splatting 8.17 8% 9.45 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45 22,057 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: O080 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 128 Write 59.6 Mixed 67.1 19% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 15.4 61% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 94.7 DQ Write 47.1 DQ Mixed 37.8 37% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 91%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 186GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 85.5 Write 79.8 Mixed 81.9 62% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.36 101% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 58%
FUJITSU MHT2040AH 40GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 36GB free, PID null Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 22 Mixed 11.2 23% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.25 35% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 13%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 703 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 29GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 105 Write 12.7 Mixed 7.06 34% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 60% 5.38 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 39%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 32GB 1,099 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 16GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 45 Write 64.2 Mixed 61.8 78% 57 MB/s	4K Read 6.09 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2.29 196% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 35%
ZTE MMC Storage 8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 4GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Read 6.16 Write 3.68 Mixed 4.14 6% 4.66 MB/s	4K Read 1.33 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.11 9% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P2550 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P2550

CPU
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	6x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	3x
Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GeForce 7100 / nForce 630iNvidiaBench 0%, 395 samples	2x

SSD
860 EVO 250GBSamsungBench 69%, 50 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
NS100 256GBLexarBench 83%, 530 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	9x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	3x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16